In 2013, New Jersey embarked on a bipartisan journey to reform its

broken and punitive bail system. Now, 10 years later, there is strong

evidence that bail reform has succeeded in dramatically reducing the

number of people in jail while maintaining community safety. 

Prior to bail reform, around 15,000 New Jerseyans were incarcerated on

any given day, with more than 75% just awaiting trial or sentencing.

Moreover, 5,000 of these people were being detained solely because

they could not afford to post cash bail. At the same time, more affluent

people who posed a danger to the community could buy their way out of

jail. In essence, the state was running a debtor’s prison, as Republican

former Gov. Chris Christie put it.

Following bipartisan legislation and a constitutional amendment

supported by 62% of voters, New Jersey essentially eliminated cash bail

and instituted a risk assessment approach in which judges consider

community safety and other factors before deciding whether to detain or

release someone before trial. 

Because of these reforms, the pretrial jail population decreased by 20%

between 2015 and 2022. Over roughly the same period, the state saw

a decrease in overall crime and a decrease in violent crime steeper than

the national average. Moreover, the percent of people charged with

a serious offense while on pretrial release remains extremely low, even

amid a national rise in violence since the Covid-19 pandemic.

Download a fact sheet here:

See the stats by clicking here

Please read this article

The occurrence of events like this should be inconceivable within the framework of our country's laws. Primary issues such as insufficient funding, political ideologies, and resource deficits are contributing to a critical state of mental health across criminal and non-criminal patient populations. Widespread reductions in funding for facilities, medical professionals, and programs have left a significant number of mental health patients with no viable options, pushing them onto the streets and into criminal activities. While there are laws intended to confine potential violent criminals either in prison or mental health facilities, some judges, driven by political motives or economic constraints, struggle to find appropriate placements for such individuals. This particular case appears to transcend these common challenges, with the explanations provided by the involved doctors deemed ludicrous. It is imperative that a movement, symbolized by Justice4Jillian, emerges to rally against such injustices. It is time for people to vociferously declare that our country deserves better, insisting on replacing weak leaders with competent ones. While the movement may commence in Tennessee, it is crucial for the entire nation to address and rectify these issues promptly. Leaders must step up NOW to prevent any other family from enduring similar hardships.